A proof of the Krohn–Rhodes Decomposition Theorem
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
A simple proof of Kashin’s decomposition theorem∗†
Compressive Sensing techniques are used in a short proof of Kashin’s decomposition theorem generalized to `p-spaces for p ≤ 1. The proof is based on the observation that the null-space of a properly-sized matrix with restricted isometry property is almost Euclidean when endowed with the `p-quasinorm. Kashin’s decomposition theorem states that, for any integer m ≥ 1, `2m 1 is the orthogonal sum ...
متن کاملAnother proof of Banaschewski's surjection theorem
We present a new proof of Banaschewski's theorem stating that the completion lift of a uniform surjection is a surjection. The new procedure allows to extend the fact (and, similarly, the related theorem on closed uniform sublocales of complete uniform frames) to quasi-uniformities ("not necessarily symmetric uniformities"). Further, we show how a (regular) Cauchy point on a closed uniform subl...
متن کاملA concise proof of Kruskal’s theorem on tensor decomposition
A theorem of J. Kruskal from 1977, motivated by a latent-class statistical model, established that under certain explicit conditions the expression of a third-order tensor as the sum of rank-1 tensors is essentially unique. We give a new proof of this fundamental result, which is substantially shorter than both the original one and recent versions along the original lines.
متن کاملA new proof for the Banach-Zarecki theorem: A light on integrability and continuity
To demonstrate more visibly the close relation between thecontinuity and integrability, a new proof for the Banach-Zareckitheorem is presented on the basis of the Radon-Nikodym theoremwhich emphasizes on measure-type properties of the Lebesgueintegral. The Banach-Zarecki theorem says that a real-valuedfunction $F$ is absolutely continuous on a finite closed intervalif and only if it is continuo...
متن کاملProof of Theorem A
Since the full proof of this theorem 10] is simple yet quite tedious, we connne ourselves to the guidelines of the proof. Observing the angles between the three sample points s i ; s j ; s k forming the minimal angle and the corresponding VD vertex v, we take advantage of the fact that d(v; s i) < d(s i ; s k) (Theorem 4.2(ii)) and, by trigonometric arguments, show that sin sin(120) R M
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Theoretical Computer Science
سال: 2000
ISSN: 0304-3975
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3975(99)00315-1